image and title

border border border border
border border
Main Menu
 Home
 Log In
 Primary Further Left site
 Ansible Group
 Definitions
 News
 Visionary Organizations
 Smiley codes
 Mamblog
 Contact Us
 FAQ
 SiteMap-Find Your Interest Here

Login Form
Username

Password

Remember me
Forgotten your password?
No account yet? Create one

Most Read
Election Protection Report from New Mexico
GOP Corporate Donors Cash In On Smut
Black Inventions
Smileys
Blue in a Red State

Hit Counter
207631 Visitors

border
border border border border
border
HomeborderNewsborderLinksborderContact us
  arrow pointing to the right   Home


Example of Ad Hominem   PDF  Print  E-mail 
Thursday, 18 August 2005

Ad Hominems, a primary logical fallacy, the main stock in trade of neocon argument. 

People who rely on ad hominems generally have no facts at their command.

http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/ad-hominem.html

Description of Ad Hominem

Translated from Latin to English, "Ad Hominem" means "against the man" or "against the person."

An Ad Hominem is a general category of fallacies in which a claim or argument is rejected on the basis of some irrelevant fact about the author of or the person presenting the claim or argument. Typically, this fallacy involves two steps. First, an attack against the character of person making the claim, her circumstances, or her actions is made (or the character, circumstances, or actions of the person reporting the claim). Second, this attack is taken to be evidence against the claim or argument the person in question is making (or presenting). This type of "argument" has the following form:

  1. Person A makes claim X.
  2. Person B makes an attack on person A.
  3. Therefore A's claim is false.

The reason why an Ad Hominem (of any kind) is a fallacy is that the character, circumstances, or actions of a person do not (in most cases) have a bearing on the truth or falsity of the claim being made (or the quality of the argument being made).

Example of Ad Hominem

  1. Bill: "I believe that abortion is morally wrong."
    Dave: "Of course you would say that, you're a priest."
    Bill: "What about the arguments I gave to support my position?"
    Dave: "Those don't count. Like I said, you're a priest, so you have to say that abortion is wrong. Further, you are just a lackey to the Pope, so I can't believe what you say."

Comments

Only registered users can write comments.
Please login or register.

Powered by AkoComment 1.0 beta 2!



go to top Go To Top go to top
powered by mambo open source - tdw
border
Latest News
Fact v. Opinion
Example of Ad Hominem
Blue in a Red State
Room Visitors Musical Info
Empires prefer a baby and the cross to the adult Jesus